  


REGISTRATION



14.02.2017 20:34


29 Jan. 12: 11
29 Jan. 11: 46
 SPACE
 29 Jan. 11: 44
 PLANET
PUBLIC.
NON COMMERCIAL.
ZELLO.
+18
THE MOST ABNORMAL PLACE ON THE INTERNET


29 Jan. 11: 19
29 Jan. 11: 18
СТИХ ELEMENT SPACE
 29 Jan. 10: 12
 SOCIETY
 29 Jan. 06: 03
 29 Jan. 05: 47
 MORE
 29 Jan. 05: 14
 29 Jan. 04: 19
 CINEMA HALL
THE SOLAR SYSTEM
UNSOLVED MYSTERIES OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
16-10-2011, 18:44

9
From year to year, new inventions are appearing that allow us to study and accumulate knowledge about the cosmos.
But many things still remain unexplored and unexplored.
Therefore, it would be naive to believe that we have answers to all the questions that interest us.
Meet the top ten most incredible mysteries of the solar system: 10.
Temperature discrepancy at the poles of the Sun
Why is the South Pole of the Sun colder than the North Pole?
In 1990, the Ulysses spacecraft was launched into space.
This is the first device that studies the Sun not only from the plane of the ecliptic (equatorial), but also from the poles.
Ulysses passed at an altitude of six radii above Jupiter, left the ecliptic plane (the plane in which the planets orbit the Sun) and headed first to the regions of interplanetary plasma from the south pole of the Sun, and then to the regions from the north pole.
The device has worked for more than 17 years, transmitting information about the Sun, about the solar wind and about the poles to the Earth.
Since the estimated service life of the device has long been out, there is almost no connection with it.
Among the scientific results, the discovered fact that the South Pole is colder than the North is interesting.
Using the onboard SWICS spectrometer, the ship
↑ ↓
анализ analyzed
the composition of the wind, the content of и ions, the registration of солнечного solar  fixing the relative кислорода of oxygen O6 + and O7+, which indirectly indicates the temperature of the gas.

14.02.2017 20:34
At the same time, Ulysses remains at a completely safe distance of 300 million km from the surface of the sun.
So the temperature of the Sun's poles was set: about a million degrees Celsius.
Why are the Southern and Northern hemispheres of Mars so different?
The southern hemisphere is dotted with craters.
The surface of the northern hemisphere has few craters and mostly consists of vast volcanic plains.
Scientists explain such a strong difference in the hemispheres of Mars by the consequences of the collision of the planet with an asteroid the size of Pluto.
According to another version, at an early geological stage, the lithospheric plates "converged" (perhaps accidentally) into one hemisphere and then "froze" in this position.
One way or another, such a difference of the hemispheres still remains a subject of discussion.
Is there really a curse of Mars?
According to many sources, something paranormal is disabling all our ships in the vicinity of the planet.
Statistics show that about 2/3 of all space missions failed.
Russian rockets, throwing spaceships to Mars, were out of order.
US satellites broke down halfway.
The British descent vehicles did not send a single signal after landing on the Red Planet.
Maybe it's all just folk tales.
Or a banal luck slipping out of your hands.
Anyway, most of the spacecraft sent to Mars were lost.
8. The Tunguska phenomenon
What happened near the Tunguska River?
Forget how Fox Mulder made his way through the Russian forests: this time it's not an episode of The X Files.
On June 30, 1908, at about seven o'clock in the morning local time, over the vast territory of the Eastern
↑ ↓
Siberia
in the interfluve of the Tunguska River from the southeast to the northwest with the REGISTRATION of the Lena andA large fiery spherical cosmic body flew past the rocky side of the Sun.

14.02.2017 20:34
Eyewitnesses described a blinding bright light that was visible for several hundred miles.
In a matter of seconds, a forest was felled by an explosive wave within a radius of about 40 kilometers, animals were destroyed, people were injured.
At the same time, under the influence of light radiation, the taiga flared up for tens of kilometers around.
The fire that started destroyed what little remained after the explosion.
A solid fall of 80 million trees occurred on an area of 2150 sq km.
A space hurricane for many years turned the taiga, once rich in vegetation and game, into a sad cemetery of the dead forest.
It was a real disaster.
But no crater was formed from the impact of the cosmic body.
What actually fell on us from the sky?
There are many hypotheses that explain the Tunguska phenomenon.
Some scientists believe that the explosion occurred due to the detonation of natural gas ignited by a meteorite that flew into the atmosphere.
There are even such strange hypotheses as the explosion of a UFO.
The solution of the problem is complicated by the fact that none of the numerous expeditions ended with the discovery of a meteorite.
7. The inclination of the rotation axis of Uranus
Why does Uranus rotate "lying on its side"?
If other planets can be compared with spinning tops, then Uranus is more like a rolling ball: the plane of the equator of Uranus is inclined to the plane of its orbit at an angle of 97.86 degrees.
This gives a completely different process of changing the seasons from other planets of the Solar system.
Each pole is in the dark for 42 earth years — and another 42 years under the light of the Sun.
It is also known that almost all the planets rotate counterclockwise (when viewed from the North Pole of the Earth).
And only Venus rotates clockwise.
↑ ↓
This is how the theory is born that the reverse rotation occurred due to the collision of a planet with a huge cosmic body.
Maybe the same thing happened to Uranus?


14.02.2017 20:34
Some scientists agree with this version.
And some see the reason in the influence of Saturn and Jupiter on Uranus.
Further study is required.
6. The atmosphere on Titan
Why does Titan have an atmosphere?
a satellite in the solar system(after the only satellite in the solar system, the only satellite whose surface is due to cloud cover.
Titan is a satellite of Saturn, the second largest of Ganymede, a satellite of Jupiter).
In addition, it is a system with a dense atmosphere, and which cannot be observed in the visible
Titan is similar to Earth, although it is inferior to it in size.
The pressure on the surface of Mars is 160 times less than that of Earth.
On the surface of Venus — about 100 times more.
The pressure at the surface of Titan is only 1.6 times higher than the pressure of the Earth's atmosphere.
In addition, the atmosphere of Titan consists mainly of nitrogen gas (about 95%) and is the closest in composition to the Earth's atmosphere (compared to other bodies of the Solar system).
But where did this nitrogen come from, both on Earth and on Titan?
This remains unknown.
5. The Solar Corona
↑ ↓




REGISTRATION



14.02.2017 20:34
Why is the corona hotter than the surface of the Sun?
The outermost, most rarefied and hottest part of the solar atmosphere is the corona.
It can be traced from the solar limb to distances of tens of solar radii.
Despite the strong gravitational field of the Sun, this is possible due to the huge speeds of movement of the particles that make up the corona.
The corona has a temperature of about a million degrees, while the photosphere has a temperature of about 6000 degrees.
But how does this happen?
If you turn on an ordinary incandescent lamp, the air surrounding it will still not become hotter than the lamp itself.
The closer you are to the light source, the hotter it becomes, not colder.
In the case of the Sun, we are faced with exactly the opposite phenomenon, which contradicts all physical laws.
4. Comet dust
How do icy comets form dust at high temperatures?
Comets are small celestial icy bodies that have a hazy appearance, orbiting the Sun usually in elongated orbits.
When approaching the Sun, the ice begins to evaporate and comets form a coma and sometimes a tail of gas and dust.
↑ ↓
Presumably, the Oort Cloud, which contains millions of comet nuclei, also flies to us from the Kuiper Belt.


14.02.2017 20:34
On January 15, 2006, the Stardust capsule with priceless samples of comet Wild 2 made a soft landing at a test site in Utah.
The comet's substance was subjected to a comprehensive analysis.
The main conclusion is that comets have a much more complex composition than expected.
The real surprise was the discovery that most of the matter is clearly cold material from the outskirts of the Solar System, but about 10% was formed at high temperatures.
It is not known where these 10% came from, if the comet did not enter the inner region of the Solar System.
3. The Kuiper Belt
How did the Kuiper Belt form?
The region of the solar system beyond the orbit of Neptune.
A large number of space objects are located in this area, the most famous (but not the largest) of which is Pluto.
The Kuiper Belt is insufficiently studied.
The American spacecraft will reach the belt only in 2015.
In the meantime, it remains to be guessed why, contrary to theories, the number of objects in the Kuiper Belt suddenly unexpectedly decreases at a distance of 50 AU.
According to one of the assumptions, there are many cosmic objects outside the 50 AU mark, but they are not grouped, so they are not visible.
There is one even more strange version: a huge cosmic body, the size of Earth or Mars, flew past the Kuiper belt, which actually "boldly" all the objects that were there.
This version has no evidence and serves only to spread rumors about the existence of Planet X.
And the mystery of the existence of the Kuiper belt has not been solved.
2. Anomaly of the "Pioneer" program"
↑ ↓




REGISTRATION



14.02.2017 20:34
Why do the Pioneer ships deviate from their course?
The devices "Pioneer 10" (launched in March 1972) and "Pioneer 11" (launched in April 1973) are the most famous devices of the series.
They were the first to reach the third cosmic speed and the first to explore deep space.
Both times, scientists noted a strange fact: the ships for some reason deviated from the course.
The deviation was small by astronomical standards (about 386 thousand km after a journey of 10 million km).
Both the first and the second time it was the same.
Scientists find it difficult to give an explanation for this.
1. The Oort Cloud
Does the Oort cloud exist?
This is the biggest mystery.
If we can still observe large space objects in the Kuiper Belt, then the Oort cloud is too far away (more than 50 thousand AU from the Sun).
The Oort Cloud is a hypothetical region of the Solar System that serves as a source of comets with a long period of rotation.
Instrumentally, the existence of the Oort cloud is not confirmed, but many indirect facts indicate its existence.
The world never ceases to surprise and puzzle us with new riddles.
But there is a lot of work for scientists!
Is the solar system a creation of the mind?
↑ ↓


14.02.2017 20:34
Is the solar system a creation of the mind?
CHECK  



Is the moon an artificial satellite?
The moon has long occupied the imagination of people.
She was worshipped, a mysterious power was attributed to her, her ghostly light inspired poets and dreamers in love.
The special role of the Moon in the well being and behavior of people was known even by the ancients.
The influence of the Moon on the sea tides, on the weather, on the speed of rotation of the Earth is indisputable.
And although today the Earth's natural satellite has been studied in quite detail and people have even visited it, there are many various mysteries, events and phenomena associated with the Moon that cannot yet be unambiguously explained.
Since ancient times, evidence has accumulated from both professional astronomers and amateurs who observed short term lunar phenomena on the Moon, or Lunar Transient Phenomena (LTP), which are divided into several types: changes in the appearance and clarity of the image of relief details; changes in brightness and flashes; color changes of a lunar object; the appearance or disappearance of dark spots; elongation of lunar horns; anomalous phenomena during the covering of stars by the Moon; non stationary phenomena during lunar eclipses; moving LTP.
The history of such observations goes back to the deep past.
One of the first descriptions of the phenomenon that happened on July 18, 1178, belongs to the English chronicler Gervase of Canterbury: five people saw how
« ... the upper horn of the new moon split into two parts.
From the middle of this rift, a flaming torch suddenly jumped out, spraying fire, red hot coals and sparks in all directions for a long distance ...
"In May 1715, the French astronomer E. Louville, observing a lunar eclipse, noticed short term flashes and instantaneous tremors of light rays at the left edge of the Moon.
Simultaneously with Louville, the famous E. Halley observed the same outbreaks in the British Isles.
Similar phenomena were observed by astronomers a little later: in August 1738, something similar to lightning appeared on the disk of the Moon; in October 1785, bright flashes of light appeared on the border of the dark lunar disk, consisting of individual small sparks and moving in straight lines to the north; in July 1842, during a solar eclipse, bright stripes occasionally crossed the lunar disk; in September 1881, a comet like object moved along the lunar disk, which was observed from two terrestrial points 12 thousand kilometers away from each other.
Let's return, however, to our time... in the fall of 1957, the American magazine "Sky and Telescope" published a photo of the outskirts of the moon, the crater Fra Mauro, obtained by astronomer R. Curtis.
↑ ↓

REGISTRATION  shadows clearly � � � � The geometrically correct Maltese cross was distinguished in the blurred lunar ones.
The examination confirmed the authenticity of the photo.

14.02.2017 20:34
The most interesting thing is that after a while there was no cross in this place.
Further.
In May 1964, American astronomers Harris, Croce and others observed a white spot moving at a speed of about 32 km/h over the Sea of Tranquility for more than an hour.
Curiously, it gradually decreased in size.
A little later, in June 1964, the same observers recorded a spot on the moon moving at a speed of 80 km / h for two hours.
On a lunar night in 1966, the English astronomer P. Moore, looking at the bottom of the lunar crater, noticed strange stripes that turned from dark to green brown, then diverged in radii, changed shape, grew and reached their maximum size by lunar noon.
By the moonlit evening, they shrank, faded, and finally disappeared altogether.
In September 1967, Canadian astronomers recorded a dark body with a purple hue at the edges in the Sea of Tranquility, moving from west to east for 10 seconds.
The body disappeared near the terminator, and after 13 minutes, a yellow light flashed for a fraction of a second near the crater located in the area of the spot's movement.
An even more fantastic observation can be made.
In 1968, American researchers noticed how three red light spots merged into one in the area of the Aristarchus crater.
Japanese astronomers, meanwhile, observed a pink spot covering the southern part of this crater.
Finally, two red and one blue stripes with a width of 8 km appeared in the crater.
and 50 km long.
It is noteworthy that all this was clearly visible at the full moon, that is, when the lunar surface is flooded with dazzling light.
The list of such observations that are concentrated in well defined areas of the visible hemisphere of the Moon could be continued, But what is it?
The obvious non random distribution of moving light objects allows, in particular, to discard the explanation of these phenomena by the effects of terrestrial atmospheric phenomena.
It is also impossible to connect them with manifestations of lunar volcanism, with particles of the tail of the Earth's magnetic field, with radiation stimulated by ultraviolet photons of solar origin, and so on.
So, we are again dealing with something still incomprehensible and mysterious...
But even more surprising are some facts and circumstances, some of which we will consider below and some can be interpreted as "traces" of alien conscious activity on the Moon or, rather, with the Moon.
"The moon is an artificial satellite!" - stated M. Khvastunov (M. Vasiliev) and R. Shcherbakov in an article that appeared on January 10, 1968 in the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda, and then in the magazine Sovetsky
↑ ↓
Союз Union".
More details and detail in the book by M. Vasilyev CHECK   this idea is considered   "Vectors of the future" (Moscow, 1971).
Over the years, new developments in the study of the moon, many of the arguments of the authors faded longer seem so convincing as before, but today are highly original and are of some interest.

14.02.2017 20:34
Trying to find explanations for many "oddities" of the Moon, Khvastunov and Shcherbakov suggested that the Moon is nothing more than an artificial spacecraft.
This "crazy" hypothesis allowed us to consider all the features of the Moon, starting from its structure and origin.
It is known that even today astrophysicists cannot unambiguously explain the process of the emergence of a kind of duet of celestial bodies Earth Moon.
The chemical composition of the lunar rocks testifies, according to the authors of the "crazy" hypothesis, that the Moon was not only not part of the Earth, as many specialists claimed, but could not appear next to it.
It turned out that the Moon appeared somewhere far from our planet, perhaps even outside the Solar System, and was "captured" by the Earth when it flew nearby.
It is difficult to say what our planet looked like in those unknown times when the spacecraft "Luna" was in near Earth orbit, what catastrophic cataclysms accompanied this "reunion"?
But immediately, clearly and definitively, the authors announced that they did not set themselves the task of answering the following questions: where did our night star come from, by whom and for what purpose was it created, why did it "land" on our planet?
The question of the existence of today's "crew" or the population of the Moon remained beyond the hypothesis.
Is there still life on it?
Or have its intelligent inhabitants become extinct over the past billions of years?
Or maybe only automatons launched by the hands of their ancient creators still function in the" cosmic tomb"?
Let us turn, however, to the arguments testifying to the" unnatural " origin of the Moon.
So, its shape is extremely close to the ball.
Well, why canot a spaceship be spherical?
After all, this is the most economical form that allows you to isolate the maximum volume with a minimum surface.
The size of the Moon.
But if this ship were of a smaller size, would its numerous crew be able to isolate itself from the hostile influence of space, protect the hull from violent meteorite impacts and survive for a sufficiently long time?
From the point of view of our current knowledge, it is quite clear that a space supership should be a very rigid metal structure.
The probable thickness of its walls is two or two and a half dozen kilometers.
However, it is known that metals have a high thermal conductivity.
To protect the ship from excessive heat loss, its creators covered the surface with a special heat protective coating.
Its thickness is several kilometers.
It was in it that countless craters were formed by meteorites, and the impacts of planetoids - the beds of the lunar seas filled with
↑ ↓
later
secondary heat protective массой mass.
REGISTRATION



14.02.2017 20:34
Inside the Moon, under the metal hull, there should be a fairly significant free space intended for mechanisms servicing the movement and repair of the space supership, a device for external observations, some structures that ensure the connection of the armor plating with the internal contents of the Moon.
It is possible that 70%-80% of the mass of the Moon, located in its depths beyond the "service belt", is the" payload " of the ship.
Guesses about its content and purpose go beyond reasonable assumptions.
Let's take a closer look at some of the features, characteristics and parameters of the Moon, as it was done by Khvastunov and Shcherbakov, who are able to confirm the "artificiality" of our celestial neighbor.
The seas of the Moon are dark spots visible even to the naked eye.
Astronomers believe that they were formed as a result of the impacts of giant planetoids.
Much later, all the depressions were filled with molten lava, and before that, the "beds of the seas" were opened for a considerable time and were subjected to meteorite bombardment.
One thing is not clear in this case: how could lava from the inner regions of the Moon cover such an even layer of extended spatial containers with a diameter of many hundreds of kilometers?
Why did it not solidify and thicken in the conditions of strong heat transfer into the void of outer space?
Why do the lava lunar outpourings look more like the water surface of the earth's oceans than the lava of Earth's volcanoes?
If we consider that the heat protective layer of the artificial Moon played a very important role in its life, then it was by no means indifferent to the inhabitants of the Moon that the impacts of oncoming meteorites tore large pieces of this skin from its metal body.
Apparently, such cases on the way, which took millions or billions of years, were foreseen in advance, and in principle they were prepared for them.
For this purpose, "pipelines" leading from "cars" located in the "service area"were quickly brought to the exposed places.
These machines prepared a powdery mass, which was displayed on the exposed surface of the Moon and covered it.
It is clear that this " powder "could not cover all the" seas " with an even layer.
But the creators of the Moon provided for this case the possibility of oscillatory movement of the Moon's surface, which allowed dust grains of sand to form a kind of"boiling layer".
They "flowed" like a liquid, filling all the depressions of the Moon, forming an almost perfect layer on hundreds of kilometers of the area of the "lunar seas".
Selenologists carefully studied and compared photos of "lunar continents" and "lunar seas" and were convinced that meteorite craters (of comparable size) are found on the continents almost 15 times more often than on the expanses of the seas.
Therefore, taking into account the constancy of the intensity of meteor bombardment for different areas of the lunar surface, we can talk about a much older age of the lunar continents than the seas.
↑ ↓
And this, as they say, we needed to "prove"...
The Boasters and Shcherbakov quite convincingly justify the appearance of such formations on the surface of the Moon as countless craters and chains of craters, "straight walls" and faults, "white rays" and "colored spots".
Their arguments attract attention for their logic, reasonableness and persuasiveness, although they are not given here because of the brevity of the presentation.


14.02.2017 20:34
The hypotheses about the artificiality of the Moon in the book "Vectors of the Future" ended with the statement about the" too much courage " of its authors, that it is
"...only the first arguments, and they still need an accurate scientific foundation ...
"For many years since Khvastunov and Shcherbakov put forward their "crazy" hypothesis, the attitude of scientists towards it was at best skeptical, and many did not pay any attention to it at all.
Maybe this was due to the fact that the authors of the hypothesis were not interested in such questions: who made the moon?
Why did they make it?
More than ten years have passed since the first publication of Khvastunov and Shcherbakov, the astronomer V. Koval tried to shed light on the mysteries of the "thin walled ball", who spoke in the seventh issue of the magazine "Technology of Youth" for 1981 with the article "Monument for Millennia".
Wondering what kind of memory other civilizations could have left about themselves if they had visited our planet at the dawn of human development, Koval comes to interesting conclusions, which we will get acquainted with.
First.
Will those who have crossed hundreds of light years of space hollow out stone idols or pave city squares with heavy stone blocks?
Really, having found a planet with developing life, they will want to leave such "heavy" and, in general, useless gifts for future aborigines as a souvenir?
It is clear that the economic and planetary science activities of hypothetical aliens can leave behind a lot of indirect "evidence" that should have been preserved on our planet.
But to count on the sloppiness and inefficiency of the technology of highly developed interstellar travelers is to replace their psychology and technique with your own.
Naturally, questions arise: where and what kind of monument should be erected so that the developing Earth civilization will be able to comprehend its essence after a certain time?
It is from these considerations that the criteria that such a "monument message" should satisfy those who once visited our planet are determined.
First of all, the monument must be durable in order to wait for the moment when the ideas and knowledge embedded in it can be perceived.
Secondly, it should attract the attention of as many people as possible with its size, brightness and unusual appearance.
Third, it should be a monument,
↑ ↓
carrier
it contains a variety of expressive, useful information that emotionally awakens interest in the cosmos and the stars.

14.02.2017 20:34
Further.
The monument should not crush a person with its greatness, but teach them to observe and compare, teach them to comprehend information unobtrusively, accessible, gradually.
To do this, the monument should be opened in new qualities as the intelligence of the aborigines develops and be multifunctional.
Finally, its artificiality should not immediately catch the eye, but appear gradually.
So, says V. Koval, in order not to erect a giant obelisk or monument unknown where and unknown for whom, in order to protect the monument from the harmful effects of near surface Earth activity — showers, winds, temperature changes, floods, "world floods", volcanic eruptions and destructive earthquakes, and at the same time to make it visible to all people of the Earth — the aliens inevitably had to put it into space!
Oddly enough, the satellite of our planet — the Moon meets all the above mentioned requirements.
Yes, yes, it is the Moon!
Not an obelisk on the far side of the Moon, not a" treasure of wisdom " of mysterious aliens in one of the lunar craters,but the Moon itself.
The most noticeable, large and attractive object in near Earth space, which meets the criteria of an" alien monument " by 100%!!!
Earlier we talked about attracting everyone's attention, and this fact is indisputable with regard to the Moon.
However, not only is it larger and brighter than all the celestial bodies in the night sky, it never remains constant: it periodically changes its phase from a narrow growing crescent immediately after the new moon to a full disk, and then gradually turns back into the " old " month.
We should not forget that it was thanks to the Moon that man realized the complexity of celestial phenomena, their connection with the fact that the Moon is a special monument, lies in the surrounding nature.
And one of the most convincing "suspicions" is in "ensuring" the possibility of periodic observations of eclipses.
Recall that for a total eclipse to occur, a number of conditions must be met.
The most important of them is the practical equality of the apparent angular dimensions of the Moon and the Sun.
It is known that the diameter of the Moon is 400 times smaller than the sun, but it is almost as much times closer to the Earth than the Sun.
So we see them at the same angle of half a degree!
The value of the angle of inclination of the planes of the orbits of the Moon and the Earth is only 5o.
If this angle were large, eclipses would become extremely rare, and if the planes of the orbits of two celestial bodies coincided, eclipses were constantly observed only in the same localities.
Arenot these nuances amazing in themselves?
Where did the moon come from?
The author of the hypothesis believes that the "aliens" found it in orbit between Mars and Jupiter, where the disappeared planet should have been rotating
↑ ↓
planet
Phaeton, asit follows Titius Bode.
REGISTRATION But it turns out that the Phaeton has not "disappeared from the rule", but is in front of our eyes!
The "transfer"of the Phaeton gives an idea of what energies the "guests" possessed.
As for the technology of "towing" the moon of PHAETON, its smooth and accurate "installation" in near Earth orbit, here we are waiting for a complete unknown.

14.02.2017 20:34
The same can be said about the time of such an "interplanetary operation".
It is possible that any information on this topic can be" laid " implicitly on the surface of our night star, in the frequency of eclipses, angles and directions to special points of the lunar orbit, and so on.
A year after the publication of V. Koval's hypothesis in the same journal "Te khnikamolodezhi "published an article" The Moon test for attention", compiled from the responses of readers who took part in the decoding of the encoded lunar space test.
For example, the Moscow artist and amateur astronomer M. Shemyakin, among the chaotic accumulation of craters on the lunar surface, discovered mysterious chains of lunar craters in 1961, the parameters of which obey strict laws.
All the chains lie on the arc of a circle, the diameter of each subsequent crater is either 21/2 (the root of two) times smaller than the previous one, or equal to it.
The distances between the crater centers also make up a geometric progression with a multiplier constant for each chain.
Let's take another equally spectacular chain of six craters located inside the giant circus Clavius, which is located near the south pole of the Moon.
This chain, perfectly visible even in a small telescope, is a decreasing series of craters, all the parameters of which are subject to a strict mathematical law.
Calculations performed on a computer showed that the accidental" entry " of craters into such chains is impossible!
And scientists have not yet come up with a natural mechanism explaining the occurrence of such formations.
Involuntarily, a crazy thought arises: arenot the converging chains a kind of arrows pointing to special points on the lunar surface?
Shouldnot it be at these points, and there are several dozen of them on the moon, that the lunar surface should be specially explored?
Who knows if there are "treasures of wisdom" or memorable signs left for earthlings?
Engineer V. Perebiynos from Krasnodar suggests that the information for us can be embedded in the ratios of masses, distances and inclinations of the orbits of various celestial bodies.
His assumption is confirmed by the calculations of engineer V. Politov from Voronezh.
He believes that in the system of celestial bodies Earth Moon Sun, the parameters of the Moon are highlighted in a special way and are practically set.
Politov found mathematical confirmation of this assumption in a number of relationships between physical constants, mathematical constants and astronomical parameters.
In his opinion, the coincidence of significant figures for individual lunar ratios is either an inexplicable accident (which is unlikely), or the result of a planned and implemented by extraterrestrial civilizations
↑ ↓
"by operations"
by setting the dimensions of the registration and orbits of the Moon - � � and adjusting � � for консерв preservation with its help of information that has a very definite meaning for the "growing" human civilization.

14.02.2017 20:34
It is difficult, of course, to prove that unusual lunar formations are somehow connected with numerical or temporal information useful for earthlings, indicating that intelligent beings visited our planet in the past.
It is difficult, of course, to prove that the Moon is a monument left by them for us, but as follows from the above, it may well be one.
Time and multifaceted scientific research can give us definitive answers to these questions...
СОЛНЕЧНАЯ SOLAR SYSTEM / REMOTE AREAS 16-10-2011, 18: 44  UFO  340  0
0
0
Did you notice a typo?
Select the text, press Ctrl + Enter and report it
NEXT PUBLICATION
PREVIOUS PUBLICATION
AN UNUSUALLY WELL PRESERVED ONE WAS FOUND IN GERMANY ...
US SENATORS RECOMMEND PLACING AMERICAN V...
A brilliantly preserved theropod skeleton has been discovered in Europe, according to researchers from the Bavarian State University...
A Washington working group led by two US senators distributed a report on Georgia and fr...
SIMILAR PUBLICATIONS
↑ ↓




REGISTRATION



14.02.2017 20:34
ASTRONOMERS ARE LOOKING FOR AN EXPLANATION FROM
